All Posts

On Spec #4 — published by Finish + Form Author's note: This article interprets published laboratory testing comparing epoxy terrazzo with matte finish and Durabella Biopolymer Terrazzo with matte finish under controlled conditions. Its purpose is to provide context for architectural specification, not to prescribe a particular solution. The discussion that follows is based on the following sources: Primary source: Intertek Building & Construction, Test Report N3216.01-106-31

On Spec #3 — published by Finish + Form Author's note: This article interprets published laboratory testing comparing epoxy terrazzo and Durabella Biopolymer Terrazzo under controlled conditions. Its purpose is to provide context for architectural specification, not to prescribe a particular solution. The discussion that follows is based on the following sources: Primary Source: Intertek USA, Inc., Pittsfield, Massachusetts. Project Number P20220434. Testing Standard: ASTM D3

On Spec #2 — published by Finish + Form Author’s Note: This article interprets independent laboratory testing conducted under ASTM C580-18 and ISO 196 standards to examine how flooring materials respond to stress. It is intended to inform specification discussions, not replace engineering judgment. As California's SB 1953 seismic retrofit program reshapes healthcare construction ahead of the 2030 compliance deadline, understanding material behavior under movement has become a

On Spec #1 — published by Finish + Form What comes to mind when you hear “sustainable”? Sustainable food. Sustainable living. Sustainable buildings. The word has been handled so often, polished so carefully, and bent into so many shapes by companies and marketing teams eager to appear responsible without accepting the cost of responsibility. Architects at firms that truly believe in sustainability and the commitment it requires— at firms like Arup, SOM, or Gensler— know this